Spice QT-65 Vs. Micromax Bolt Q 333 - Comparison
Side By Side Comparison of Spice QT-65 and Micromax Bolt Q 333. Compare Processor, display, RAM, Storage and other features here. You can quickly compare Spice QT-65 and Micromax Bolt Q 333 smartphones just by looking at their ratings and results showing "winner" and "runner up." There is also a short analysis comparing different features of Spice QT-65 and Micromax Bolt Q 333. You can also look at each hardware feature individually to perform your analysis while comparing mobile phones.
|Spice QT-65||Micromax Bolt Q 333|
Micromax Bolt Q 333 has better processor than Spice QT-65 has.
Better processor means better performance of the phone.Better Display
Micromax Bolt Q 333 has better display than Spice QT-65
Better screen resolution means sharper images, videos and text.Larger Display
Micromax Bolt Q 333 has larger screen than Spice QT-65
Bigger screens means you have more space to interact with phone and applications.Better Rear Camera
Micromax Bolt Q 333 has better rear camera as compared to Spice QT-65.
Better rear camera helps in capturing high quality, sharp and clear photos.Battery
Micromax Bolt Q 333 has larger battery as compared to Spice QT-65
The higher the battery capacity, the longer the battery of the smartphone will last.
|Model||Spice QT-65||Micromax Bolt Q 333|
|Released on||November 2011|
|Dimensions (mm)||112.00 x 60.00 x 11.80|
|Screen size (inches)||2.20||4.5|
|Resolution||176x220 pixels||480x720 pixels|
|Pixel density||192 ppi|
|Screen to body ratio|
|Expandable Storage Type||microSD, up to 8GB||microSD, up to 32GB|
|Processor||650MHz||1.2 GHz Quad Core|
|Operating System||Proprietary||Android 4.4.2 (KitKat)|
|Front Camera Featrues|
|Wi-Fi||No||Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n|
|Bluetooth||Yes, v 2.10||Yes|
|Ambient light sensor||No|
|Fast Charging Support|
|Wireless Charging Support|