- Price
- Buy Here
- Remove
- Brand
- Released On
- Dimensions
- Weight
- Colors
- Body Material
- Display
- Screen size (inches)
- Touchscreen
- Touchscreen Type
- Resolution
- Screen Protection
- Pixel density
- Screen to body ratio
- Display Features
- Memory
- RAM
- Internal Storage
- Expandable Storage
- Expandable Storage Type
- Processor
- Processor
- Chipset
- GPU
- Software
- Operating System
- Camera
- Rear Camera
- Flash
- Front Camera
- Front Flash
- Connecvitity
- 3G
- 4G / LTE
- Wi-Fi
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Bluetooth
- GPS
- NFC
- USB
- Sensors
- Fingerprint
- Iris Scanner
- Heart Scanner
- Infrared
- Compass/ Magnetometer
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light
- Gyroscope
- Barometer
- Temperature
- Battery
- Battery capacity (mAh)
- Removable Battery
- Fast Charging
- Wireless Charging
- Price
-
ZTE Blade V7
- Rs.0
- Buy Here
- ZTE
- February 2016
- 146.00 x 72.50 x 7.50
- Gold, Silver
- Case: Metal Back: Metal
- 5.20
- Yes
- IPS LCD
- 1920x1080 pixels
- 424
- 70.26
- Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
- 2GB
- 16GB
- Yes
- 64
- 1.3GHz octa-core
- MediaTek MT6753
- Mali-T720 MP3
- Android6.0
- 13-megapixel
- Yes, Dual-color LED Flash
- 5-megapixel
- No
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n
- Yes
- Yes, v 4.0
- Yes,with A-GPS, Glonass
- No
- Yes, microUSB 2.0
- No
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- No
- No
- 2500
- No
- Buy Here
-
Lava Iris Fuel 60
- December 2014
- 5.00
- Yes
- Capacitive
- 720x1280 pixels
- 1GB
- 8GB
- Yes
- 32
- 1.3GHz quad-core
- Android4.4
- 10-megapixel
- Yes
- 2-megapixel
- Yes
- Yes
- No
- Yes, v 4.0
- Yes
- No
- Yes, Micro-USB
- No
- Yes
- Yes
- No
- No
- No
- 4000
- Yes
- Buy Here
ZTE Blade V7 Vs. Lava Iris Fuel 60 - Comparison
In this page, you just saw the ZTE Blade V7 Vs. Lava Iris Fuel 60 - Comparison. You can compare specifications side by side and decide what phone is better. As the data is being generateed automatically, there might be errors. If you think specs of any phone is wrong, you can report us.
ZTE Blade V7 Vs. Lava Iris Fuel 60 - Comparison will help you in deciding what phone is better