validator.w3

iQoo 3 (5G) Vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 - Comparison

Side By Side Comparison of iQoo 3 (5G) and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. iQoo 3 (5G) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 comparison to compare Processor, display, RAM, Storage and other features.

This page was last updated on 28, April 2024

Product Name iQoo 3 (5G) Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3
Product Image iQoo 3 (5G) Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3
Specs score 95.41 99.32
Price Rs.46990 Rs.51999
Buy Here Buy Here Buy Here
Action
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Extra buttons for gaming
  • Capable cameras
  • Immersive Display
  • Solid build 
  • 55W fast charging
  • Enhanced durability
  • 120Hz display
  • IPX8 water resistance
  • Enhanced durability

 

Cons
  • Fairly heavy
  • No IP Rating
  • Bloatware that can’t be uninstalled
  • Short battery life
  • no telephoto lens
Manufacturer iQoo Samsung
Released On February 2020 August 2021
Weight (Grams) 214.50 g 183.00
Colors Volcano Orange, Quantum Silver, Tornado Black Cream, Green, Lavender, Phantom Black [Samsung.com exclusive colours- Gray, White, Pink]
Dimensions 158.51 x 74.88 x 9.16 mm Folded: 72.2 x 86.4 x 15.9~17.1 mm,Unfolded: 166 x 72.2 x 6.9 mm
Body Material Case: Aluminium alloy Back: Glass Case: Aluminium alloy Back: Glass
Display
Screen Size 6.44 6.70
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Touchscreen Type E3 Super AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 pixels 1080x2640 pixels
Screen Protection Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Pixel density 409 425
Screen to body ratio 84.46 84.7
Secondary screen 1.90
Secondary screen protection
Secondary screen resolution 260x512 pixels
Display Features -Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
-2.5D curved glass screen
-100% DCI-P3
-HDR10+
-Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
-3D curved glass screen
-120 Hz Refresh Rate
-HDR10+
Software
Operating System Android v10.0 Android v11.0
Custom OS iQOO UI 1.0 One UI 3.1
Processor
Processor Octa core 2.84 GHz + 2.42 GHz + 1.8 GHz Octa core 2.84 GHz + 2.42 GHz + 1.8 GHz
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 650
Memory
RAM 12GB (LPDDR5) 8GB (LPDDR5)
Internal Storage 256GB (UFS 3.1) 128GB (UFS 3.1)
Expandable Storage No No
Camera
Rear Camera 48+ 13+ 13+ 2 MP 12+ 12 MP
Flash Yes,LED Flash Yes, LED Flash
Front Camera 16-megapixel 10-megapixel
Front Flash Yes,Screen flash No
Connectivity
5G Yes
4G Yes Yes
WI-FI Yes,802.11a/b/g/n/ac 2.4 GHz/5.1 GHz Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11 ax (2.4GHz + 5GHz)
Bluetooth Yes, v 5.1 Yes, v5.1 LE
GPS Yes,with A-GPS, Glonass Yes, with A-GPS
NFC No Yes
USB USB Type-C 3.0 USB Type-C 3.1
Sensors
Fingerprint Yes (On-screen) Yes (Side)
Accelerometer Yes Yes
Proximity Yes Yes
Compass/ Magnetometer Yes Yes
Proximity Yes Yes
Gyroccope Yes Yes
Barometer Yes No
Temperature No No
Battery
Battery Capacity 4440 mAh 3300 mAh
Fast Charging Yes,Super FlashCharge 55w Yes, 15w Fast Charge
Wireless Charging Yes, 10w Qi
Wireless Reverse Charging Yes, 4.5w
Buy Here Buy Here Buy Here

iQoo 3 (5G) Vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 - Comparison

You can see the comparison of phones side by side. Now you are free to judge and decide what phone to buy.

Frequenty Asked Questons about iQoo 3 (5G) Vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 - Comparison

What is the better in iQoo 3 (5G) and iQoo 3 (5G)?

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than iQoo 3 (5G) in terms of specs

Is iQoo 3 (5G) is better than iQoo 3 (5G)?

It seems Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than iQoo 3 (5G) in terms of specs

Which phone has better performance in iQoo 3 (5G) and iQoo 3 (5G)?

It seems Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than iQoo 3 (5G) in performance.

Which phone has bigger display in iQoo 3 (5G) and iQoo 3 (5G)?

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has larger display than the display of iQoo 3 (5G). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 comes with a 6.70 inch display that is bigger than the 6.44 inch display of iQoo 3 (5G)

What is the cheaper in iQoo 3 (5G) and iQoo 3 (5G)?

iQoo 3 (5G) is cheaper than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3

In iQoo 3 (5G) and iQoo 3 (5G), what phone has larger battery?

iQoo 3 (5G) has 4440 mAh battery that is larger than 3300 mAh battery of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3

See similar comparisons