validator.w3

Moto G82 (8GB) Vs Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB) - Comparison

Side By Side Comparison of Moto G82 (8GB) and Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB). Moto G82 (8GB) vs Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB) comparison to compare Processor, display, RAM, Storage and other features.

This page was last updated on 10, June 2026

Product Name Moto G82 (8GB) Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB)
Product Image Moto G82 (8GB) Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB)
Specs score
91.53
90.48
Price Rs.14999 Rs.27499
Buy Here Buy Here Buy Here
Action
Pros
  • Brilliant 120Hz AMOLED display
  • IP67 dust and water resistant
  • Good battery life
  • Good camera performance
  • Stereo speakers sound good.

 

Cons
  • Mediocre ultra-wide and macro cameras
  • Slower faster charging than competition
Manufacturer Motorola Samsung
Released On June 2022 March 2023
Weight (Grams) 173.00 199.00
Colors Meteorite Gray, White Lily Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver
Dimensions 160.80 x 74.46 x 7.99 161.30 x 78.10 x 8.20
Body Material Case: Aluminium alloy Back: Plastic Case: Aluminium alloy Back: Plastic
Water Resistance Yes, IP52 Yes, IP67
Dust Resistance Yes Yes
Display
Screen Size 6.6 6.6
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Touchscreen Type pOLED Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2460 pixels 1080x2400 pixels
Screen Protection
Pixel density 402 390
Screen to body ratio 87.91 84.9
Display Features -Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
-2.5D curved glass screen
-120 Hz Refresh Rate
-Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
-2.5D curved glass screen
-120Hz refresh rate
Software
Operating System Android v12.0 Android v13.0
Custom OS My UX One UI 5.1
Processor
Processor Octa core 2.2 GHz + 1.7 GHz Octa core 2.6 GHz + 2.0 GHz
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 MediaTek Dimensity 1080
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MC4
Cooling System
Memory
RAM 8GB (LPDDR4X) 8GB (LPDDR4X)
Internal Storage 128GB (UFS 2.2) 128GB
Expandable Storage Yes (1TB) Yes (1TB)
Camera
Rear Camera 50+ 8+ 2 MP 48+ 8+ 5 MP
Flash Yes, LED Flash Yes, LED Flash
Zoom
Rear Camera Video Recording 1920x1080 @ 60/30 fps, 1280x720 @ 30 fps 1920x1080 @ 30 fps, 1280x720 @ 30 fps
Front Camera 16-megapixel 13-megapixel
Front Flash No No
Front Camera Video Recording 1920x1080 @ 30 fps, 1280x720 @ 30 fps 1920x1080 @ 30 fps, 1280x720 @ 30 fps
Connectivity
5G Yes Yes
4G Yes Yes
WI-FI Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11 ac (2.4GHz + 5GHz) Yes, Wi-Fi 6 802.11 ax (2.4GHz + 5GHz)
Bluetooth Yes, v5.1 Yes, v 5.2
GPS Yes, with A-GPS, Glonass Yes with A-GPS, Glonass
NFC Yes No
USB USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Sensors
Fingerprint Yes (Side) Yes (On-screen)
Accelerometer Yes Yes
Proximity Yes Yes
Compass/ Magnetometer Yes Yes
Proximity Yes Yes
Gyroccope No No
Barometer No No
Temperature No No
Audio
Headphone Port 3.5mm Type-C
Audio Features -Stereo Speakers
-Dolby Atmos
-Stereo speakers
-Dolby Atmos
Battery
Battery Capacity 5000 5000
Fast Charging Yes, 33w Fast Charge Yes, 25w Fast Charge
Buy Here Buy Here Buy Here

Moto G82 (8GB) Vs Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB) - Comparison

You can see the comparison of phones side by side. Now you are free to judge and decide what phone to buy.

Frequenty Asked Questons about Moto G82 (8GB) Vs Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB) - Comparison

What is the better in Moto G82 (8GB) and Moto G82 (8GB)?

Moto G82 (8GB) is better than Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB) in terms of specs

Is Moto G82 (8GB) is better than Moto G82 (8GB)?

Yes.Moto G82 (8GB) is better than Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB) in terms of specs

Which phone has better performance in Moto G82 (8GB) and Moto G82 (8GB)?

Moto G82 (8GB) is better than Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB) in terms of performance.

Which phone has bigger display in Moto G82 (8GB) and Moto G82 (8GB)?

Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB) has larger display than the display of Moto G82 (8GB). Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB) comes with a 6.6 inch display that is bigger than the 6.6 inch display of Moto G82 (8GB)

What is the cheaper in Moto G82 (8GB) and Moto G82 (8GB)?

Moto G82 (8GB) is cheaper than Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB)

In Moto G82 (8GB) and Moto G82 (8GB), what phone has larger battery?

Samsung Galaxy A34 (8GB) has 5000 battery that is larger than 5000 battery of Moto G82 (8GB)

See similar comparisons