validator.w3

Vivo X200 FE Vs iPhone 16 - Comparison

Side By Side Comparison of Vivo X200 FE and iPhone 16. Vivo X200 FE vs iPhone 16 comparison to compare Processor, display, RAM, Storage and other features.

This page was last updated on 10, June 2026

Product Name Vivo X200 FE iPhone 16
Product Image Vivo X200 FE iPhone 16
Specs score
128.32
137.34
Price Rs.54999 Rs.69900
Buy Here Buy Here Buy Here
Action
Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design 
  • IP68/IP69-rated
  • Impressive Display 
  • Good camera
  • Great battery life.
  • Stylish design
  • Powerful performance
  • Good camera performance  
  • Spatial photo and video support
Cons
  • No wireless charging
  • Average Ultrawide camera
  • Still just a 60Hz display
Manufacturer Vivo Apple
Released On 23rd June 2025 9th September 2024
Weight (Grams) 186.00 170.00
Colors Amber Yellow, Frost Blue, Luxe Grey Black, White, Pink, Teal, Ultramarine
Dimensions 150.83 x 71.76 x 7.99 147.60 x 71.60 x 7.80
Body Material Back: Color-infused Glass
Water Resistance Yes, IP68/IP69 Yes, IP68
Dust Resistance Yes Yes
Display
Screen Size 6.31 6.10
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Touchscreen Type LTPO AMOLED OLED
Resolution 1216x2640 pixels 1179x2556 pixels
Screen Protection Ceramic Shield
Pixel density 460 460
Screen to body ratio
Display Features - 2.5D curved glass screen
- 5000 nits Peak Brightness
- 120 Hz Refresh Rate
- HDR10+
- SGS Low Blue Light Certified
- Super Retina XDR
- Oleophobic coating
- DCI-P3
- HDR10
- Dolby Vision
- Haptic Touch
Software
Operating System Android 15 iOS 18
Custom OS Funtouch OS 15
Processor
Processor octa-core hexa-core
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ Apple A18
GPU Immortalis-G720 MC12 Apple GPU (six-core graphics)
Cooling System
Memory
RAM 12GB, 16GB (LPDDR5X) 8GB (LPDDR5)
Internal Storage 256GB, 512GB (UFS 3.1) 128GB, 256GB, 512GB (NVMe)
Expandable Storage No
Camera
Rear Camera 50 + 8+ 50 MP 48 + 12 MP
Flash Yes, Dual LED Flash Dual LED
Zoom 100 x (digital zoom)
3 x (optical zoom)
10 x (digital zoom)
2x (optical zoom)
Rear Camera Video Recording 3840x2160 @ 60 fps, 1920x1080 @ 120 fps 3840x2160 @ 60 fps, 1920x1080 @ 240 fps
Front Camera 50-megapixel 12-megapixel
Front Flash Yes, Screen Flash Yes, Retina Flash
Front Camera Video Recording 3840x2160 @ 60 fps 3840x2160 @ 60 fps, 1920x1080 @ 120 fps
Connectivity
5G Yes Yes
4G Yes Yes
WI-FI Yes, Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/be/ax) 5GHz Yes, Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/be/ax) 5GHz 6GHz
Bluetooth Yes, v 5.40 Yes, v 5.30
GPS Yes with A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, NavIC, QZSS Yes with A-GPS, BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass
NFC Yes Yes
USB Type-C Type-C
Sensors
Fingerprint Yes (under-display) No
Infrared Yes
Accelerometer Yes Yes
Proximity Yes Yes
Compass/ Magnetometer Yes Yes
Proximity Yes Yes
Gyroccope Yes Yes
Barometer Yes
Temperature
Audio
Headphone Port Type-C Type-C
Audio Features Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus
Battery
Battery Capacity 6500 3561
Fast Charging Yes, 90W Flash Charging Yes
Wireless Charging Yes
Wireless Fast Charging Yes, 25W Magsafe
Buy Here Buy Here Buy Here

Vivo X200 FE Vs iPhone 16 - Comparison

You can see the comparison of phones side by side. Now you are free to judge and decide what phone to buy.

Frequenty Asked Questons about Vivo X200 FE Vs iPhone 16 - Comparison

What is the better in Vivo X200 FE and Vivo X200 FE?

iPhone 16 is better than Vivo X200 FE in terms of specs

Is Vivo X200 FE is better than Vivo X200 FE?

It seems iPhone 16 is better than Vivo X200 FE in terms of specs

Which phone has better performance in Vivo X200 FE and Vivo X200 FE?

It seems iPhone 16 is better than Vivo X200 FE in performance.

Which phone has bigger display in Vivo X200 FE and Vivo X200 FE?

Vivo X200 FE has larger display than the display of iPhone 16. Vivo X200 FE comes with a 6.31 inch display that is bigger than the 6.10 inch display of iPhone 16

What is the cheaper in Vivo X200 FE and Vivo X200 FE?

Vivo X200 FE is cheaper than iPhone 16

In Vivo X200 FE and Vivo X200 FE, what phone has larger battery?

Vivo X200 FE has 6500 battery that is larger than 3561 battery of iPhone 16

See similar comparisons