Up to 40% on Mobile Phones

  1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G VS HiSilicon Kirin 970 Comparison
validator.w3

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G VS HiSilicon Kirin 970 Comparison

Comparison of HiSilicon Kirin 970 and HiSilicon Kirin 970. See Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G VS HiSilicon Kirin 970 Compare Processor specs, benchmark scores, and performance. See what mobile processor is better.

This page tells you key differences in specs of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and HiSilicon Kirin 970. If you care for performance, you can check this comparison. We have also compared the benchmark scores to tell you performance differences in Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and HiSilicon Kirin 970.

This page was last updated on 11, December 2024

CPU Performance
Snapdragon 765G
80% Complete (danger)
44
Kirin 970
80% Complete (danger)
33
Gaming Performance
Snapdragon 765G
80% Complete (danger)
35
Kirin 970
80% Complete (danger)
31
Battery Performance
Snapdragon 765G
80% Complete (danger)
44
Kirin 970
80% Complete (danger)
33
Product Name Snapdragon 765G Kirin 970
Released On December 2019 September 2017
Brand Qualcomm HiSilicon
Model Number SM7250-AB Hi3670
snapdragon HiSilicon
Benchmarks
Antutu
CPU 111262
GPU 105494
Memory 70354
UX 91765
Total score 377361
CPU 76021
GPU 96440
Memory 66735
UX 82554
Total score 318939
Geekbench
Single-Core Score 584
Multi-Core Score 1786
Image compression 95.1 Mpixels/s
Face detection 12.3 images/s
Speech recognition 30.3 words/s
Machine learning 29.6 images/s
Camera shooting 14.2 images/s
HTML 5 1.24 Mnodes/s
SQLite 515.7 Krows/s
Single-Core Score 386
Multi-Core Score 1364
Image compression 90.1 Mpixels/s
Face detection 11.4 images/s
Speech recognition 24.4 words/s
Machine learning 21.3 images/s
Camera shooting 11.2 images/s
HTML 5 1.59 Mnodes/s
SQLite 415.6 Krows/s
3D Mark
Stability 99%
Graphics test 10 FPS
Score 1686
Stability 75%
Graphics test 4 FPS
Score 832
Processor
Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz - Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76), 1x 2.2 GHz - Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76), 6x 1.8 GHz - Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55) 4x 2.36 GHz - Cortex A73, 4x 1.84 GHz - Cortex A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2360 MHz
Instruction Set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8-A
Transistor Count 5.5 billion
L1 Cache
L2 Cache 512 KB
L3 Cache 2 MB
Manufacturing Process 7 nanometers 10 nanometers
TDP 8 W 9 W
Graphics
GPU Name Adreno 620 Mali G72 MP12
Graphis Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost
GPU Frequency 750 MHz 850 MHz
Execution Units 3 12
Shading Units 192 192
Shading Units 192 192
FLOPS 700 Gigaflops 347 Gigaflops
Vulkan Version 1.1 1.0
Opencl Version 2.0 2.0
DirectX Version 12 12
Memory
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 29.8 Gbit/s
Max Size 12 GB 8 GB
Storage Type eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.1
Multimedia
Neural Processor Hexagon 696 Yes
Max Display Resolution 3200 x 1800 3840 x 2160
Max Camera Resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
Video Capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video Playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video Codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, VC-1
Audio Codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV 32 bit@384 kHz, HD-audio
Connectivity
Modem X52
4G LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G Yes No
Download Speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload Speed Up to 210 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.0 4.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G VS HiSilicon Kirin 970 Comparison

You can see the comparison of both mobile platforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and HiSilicon Kirin 970 side by side. Now you are free to judge and decide what mobile platform is better and offers better performance.

Similar Mobile Processor Comparison

© Copyright 2023 Techlomedia Internet.  |  Made with in India