1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 VS HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) Comparison
validator.w3

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 VS HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) Comparison

Comparison of HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G). See Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 VS HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) Compare Processor specs, benchmark scores, and performance. See what mobile processor is better.

This page tells you key differences in specs of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G). If you care for performance, you can check this comparison. We have also compared the benchmark scores to tell you performance differences in Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G).

This page was last updated on 10, June 2026

CPU Performance
Snapdragon 888
80% Complete (danger)
85
Kirin 990 (4G)
80% Complete (danger)
61
Gaming Performance
Snapdragon 888
80% Complete (danger)
92
Kirin 990 (4G)
80% Complete (danger)
50
Battery Performance
Snapdragon 888
80% Complete (danger)
85
Kirin 990 (4G)
80% Complete (danger)
61
Product Name Snapdragon 888 Kirin 990 (4G)
Released On December 2020 October 2019
Brand Qualcomm HiSilicon
Model Number SM8350
snapdragon HiSilicon
Benchmarks
Antutu
CPU 212479
GPU 304840
Memory 137606
UX 147850
Total score 802651
CPU 143538
GPU 161429
Memory 107678
UX 84092
Total score 494398
Geekbench
Single-Core Score 1117
Multi-Core Score 3661
Image compression 176.7 Mpixels/s
Face detection 27.4 images/s
Speech recognition 68.35 words/s
Machine learning 66.45 images/s
Camera shooting 36.4 images/s
HTML 5 3.91 Mnodes/s
SQLite 1060 Krows/s
Single-Core Score 735
Multi-Core Score 3050
Image compression 148.7 Mpixels/s
Face detection 23.9 images/s
Speech recognition 54.1 words/s
Machine learning 55.8 images/s
Camera shooting 28.2 images/s
HTML 5 3.13 Mnodes/s
SQLite 797.5 Krows/s
3D Mark
Stability 92%
Graphics test 31 FPS
Score 5304
Stability 46%
Graphics test 19 FPS
Score 3284
Processor
Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz - Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1), 3x 2.42 GHz - Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78), 4x 1.8 GHz - Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55) 2x 2.86 GHz - Cortex-A76, 2x 2.09 GHz - Cortex-A76, 4x 1.86 GHz - Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2840 MHz 2860 MHz
Instruction Set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
Transistor Count 8 billion
L1 Cache 512 KB 512 KB
L2 Cache 1 MB 2 MB
L3 Cache 4 MB
Manufacturing Process 5 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP 10 W 6 W
Graphics
GPU Name Adreno 660 Mali G76 MP16
Graphis Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost
GPU Frequency 840 MHz 600 MHz
Execution Units 2 16
Shading Units 512 256
Shading Units 512 256
FLOPS 1720 Gigaflops 768 Gigaflops
Vulkan Version 1.1 1.1
Opencl Version 2.0 2.0
DirectX Version 12 12
Memory
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 34.1 Gbit/s
Max Size 24 GB 12 GB
Storage Type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Multimedia
Neural Processor Hexagon 780 Da Vinci
Max Display Resolution 3840 x 2160 3360 x 1440
Max Camera Resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Video Capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video Playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video Codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VC-1
Audio Codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
Modem X60 Balong 765
4G LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 21
5G Yes No
Download Speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 1400 Mbps
Upload Speed Up to 316 Mbps Up to 200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 VS HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) Comparison

You can see the comparison of both mobile platforms Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) side by side. Now you are free to judge and decide what mobile platform is better and offers better performance.

Similar Mobile Processor Comparison

© Copyright 2026 Techlomedia Internet.  |  Made with in India